Skip to main content

Friday Fun: More Than 20 Partners Cuts Prostate Cancer Risk

Men with numerous lovers have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer because they have more sex, scientists say.



Lotharios who have had more than 20 partners have a 28 percent reduced risk compared with men who have had only one sexual partner in their lifetime, they claim.
But it is the amount of sex they have rather than the number of partners that cuts the cancer risk.

Lead researcher Prof. Marie-Elise Parent, from the University of Montreal, said 'it is possible that having many female sexual partners results in a higher frequency of ejaculation, whose protective effect against prostate cancer has been previously observed in cohort studies.'
Men who are virgins are almost twice likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer as those who are sexually experienced, it was claimed.

One theory is that large numbers of ejaculation may reduce the concentration of cancer-causing substances on prostatic-fluid, a constituent of semen.
But the same is not true for gay men-Where having more than 20 male partners doubles the risk of prostate cancer.
The danger of a less aggressive cancer type also rises five fold, possibly to do with greater exposure to sexually transmitted infections or forum of gay sex.
More than  3,200 men aged between 40 and 79 answered questions about their lifestyle and sex lives in the prostate cancer and environment study. 
Prof. Parent added: We were fortunate to have participants who were comfortable talking about their sexuality.
(Culled from Vanguard)



So what are your thoughts???

Comments

Oluwa Troy said…
Thank you for this enlightening piece. I like the length. I think it's time I got my sexual groove on. 20 partners hunh. Ko po rara ;-)

Popular posts from this blog

Venting Tuesday : Convo With A Scammer

When will these scammers learn? Yes, scammers!!! Ever got a text message from a weird number telling you you have just won a large sum of money courtesy a popular brand? Or, perhaps, a strange phone-call from 'a long lost relative, friend, old school mate' and everything in between telling you how much he/she has missed you and would love to see you again after so many years ...blah-blah-blah Apparently, those examples I gave fall under the electronic type of duping (scam), other types of the electronic duping include email advanced fees, plishing . The face to face duping is another type of scam. Here, the fraudsters come to their victim in person, inviting them to participate in a too good to be true deal. They tell the victim he need not worry about money anymore because the deal they are offering will save him from being financially handicap for life. They even engage their victim in a discussion depending on the type of deal involved. The term 'scammer' is a

Game or Simply Lame

I was having one of my chitchat moments with a close friend and the topic 'Standards' was raised. It was then I realized that many dating couples have too high standards they expect of each other thus many single people or broken marriages. Everyone has standards,they keeps us motivated to do our best, but often times these standards cause undue stress. Some often impose their standards on their loved ones; this is a new source of stress and frustration for partners who feel they cannot meet these expectations. I'm not saying standards are not good or unhealthy in relationship, I only think it shouldn't determine how much or how far the relationship should go. It also shouldn't be a criterium to determine if the relationship will lead to marriage but then again who is to blame? The partner with unattainable standards or the one who isn't truthful to him or herself and believes these standards can be reached.

10,000 PAGEVIEWS and still counting

YAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY!!! 10,000 pageviews!